How agents of influence are trained. The fifth column: how agents of influence are recruited. The human factor of "color revolutions"

Why does the husband of the Queen of England dream of becoming a deadly virus?

What mental illness do the family members who rule the world suffer? Why don't Russians fit into the plans of the world's elites? What nation is considered the most suitable as slaves for the "golden billion"? Why can't Russia do without corruption? How are Russians different from Brazilians and Indians? Why will Russians never come to terms with the results of the "privatization" of the 1990s? Why are the most powerful information strikes delivered according to the Russian tradition? Famous Russian historian and publicist, full member of the International Academy of Sciences, Andrey Ilyich Fursov in the classroom of the School of Analytics, he shares classified information.

- I have an acquaintance - a hereditary psychiatrist, who headed a psychiatric hospital in St. Petersburg for fifteen years. He is a brilliant analyst who has combined two occupations - political and clinical analysis... He deals with mental health ten to twenty families, who rule the world... The six largest families out of the first ten have big number people with mental disabilities, which can be characterized as sociopathy – misanthropy... They are not misanthropes, but sociopaths who experience a feeling of active dislike for people, resulting in certain actions. It looks like this. For example, Chubais is told that 30 million will die. He answered: "They didn't fit into the market."... This state of affairs is serious when there are means for the implementation of misanthropic actions. With these funds, the Royal House of Great Britain created through front structures the "Society for the Protection wildlife", Proclaiming the motto "The earth is tired of people"... All this is supervised by the husband of Queen Elizabeth, Charles' father. The Duke stated that "I would like to return to Earth with a deadly virus in order to rid it once and for all of an extra number of eaters ..."

Just today I had to answer on the "Eye of the Planet" portal to a question from people, whether the world elite has some kind of ideology or religion? I replied that yes: there is such a quasi-ideology, quasi-religion - satanic ecology... "Ecologism" is an attempt to free the Earth from excess population. In our country, it seems, Chubais said that by the end of the 21st century there should be 2 billion people on the planet. Unlike the "theory of the golden billion" (in general), Chubais "became generous" by 2 billion. Leaked classified information about who needs to be left as the second billion for the service staff.

Who could it be? Chinese? They are hardworking, but if they have a leader who says, "Hit!", They will go after him. Arabs? Not! They cannot work. They are being used now to create a "booze", and then actually drive them into a ghetto, cut off from energy - that's all. Indians! They are ideal, because the "inviolability" of the existence of the caste system has "eaten" into their consciousness. In the east, only in India did parliamentary democracy take root, since the caste system predetermined the performance of all the "dirty work" in advance.

Imagine a congress of the Communist Party of India (it has three parts, organized according to the caste principle - upper, middle and lower). Gathering, the members of the Communist Party denounce the caste system. During lunch break, they go out through four different exits and eat in different places. On the other hand, if the caste system is abolished in India now, they will start a massacre - the caste system "holds" India. This often happens when some evil performs a "positive" function. For example, our leaders say without hesitation: "We have corruption - a system-forming element of society"(words by Medvedev). If so, then, first, corruption is no longer corruption, but something else. Secondly, it turns out that if corruption is removed, the country will collapse.

Another example. I have acquaintances from the Ministry of Internal Affairs who specialize in constant contacts with the leaders of criminal groups, since crime is also a kind of way of managing society. Acquaintances said that in the mid-90s, the leaders of criminal groups were seriously worried about the possible collapse of Russia. Proceeding from their economic interests, ideologically they turned out to be patriots of their country. The most important thing for them was exclusion of foreign capital.

Let's go back to the caste system. Indians seem to be ideal slave workers, since they have not formed in their minds the concept of such a value as social justice... This is a psychologically extremely depressed country: Indians take social injustice for granted, caste predetermined. Brazilians (and all Latin Americans), by the way, perceive social injustice as an individual, personal failure from which your children can "jump out." Because in Latin America poverty is very funny. India should not be judged by their films. The faces of Indian actors are mostly white because this profession, respected in India, is practiced by people of the highest caste - brahmanas. The Kapoor family belongs to a caste slightly lower than the Brahmins. Famous actor Bachchan is of the highest caste.

For Indians, cinema means much more than Hollywood. Regardless of the conditions, in what sheds in Mumbai they shoot their films, nevertheless, they completely control their film market. Cinema in India - a management tool social processes : it replaces reality for Indians and relieves social tension. I have been told by Indian sociologists and political scientists that the film Slumdog Millionaire, which appeared at a time of rising social tension, helped to "dissipate" this tension. Cinema has a strong effect on people with primitive, semi-infantile psychology.

What is the fundamental difference between Russians from, say, Brazilians and Indians?

Since Russians have such a value as social justice, Russians will never accept as socially acceptable the action of those people who "grabbed" in the 90s. They will remain thieves and bloodsuckers for people. For Brazilians, the person who stole and became a businessman is a fine fellow, a successful person. For this reason, according to the Russian tradition, blows are struck that should break Russian archetypes. Take, for example, VG broadcasts. First there is the program “Let's Get Married”, where strange people are sitting, three women, two of whom are not quite adequate. The transmission creates a certain background. Then comes the transfer of Malakhov, who "pulls out" extreme cases and passes them off as the norm: they say, look, you are freaks. This is followed by "News" and a film about "cops" with bandits and prostitutes. I go outside and see around me normal people: they live very, very differently.

If there is no unhealthy atmosphere, then it must be created, which, apparently, does not work out very well - there is no way people have an inferiority complex, inferiority complex. But work in this direction is purposefully carried out. The most important thing - the archetype of social justice breaks down... Remember, about eight years ago on TV there was an absolutely vile program "The Weakest Link", the essence of which was to "knock out" the strongest. These things were once explained to me by a CIA officer when I was in last time taught in the States. He introduced himself as a lawyer, had a law firm operating in Russia and America. He was an intelligent man, very well informed - his "CIA ears were sticking out." He did not particularly conceal that he was a specific lawyer.

The American claimed that the techniques of manipulating people, worked out on Western material, from computer "shooters" to TV series, do not work in Russia, because the specific laughter culture of Russia strongly interferes with the influence of Western propaganda (I think that he deduced this empirically very correctly on his own, and not on the basis of the works of cultural studies). In the West, if it's scary, then it's not funny, if it's funny, then it's not scary. According to Russian tradition (Gogol, Russians folk tales) can be funny and scary at the same time: everything "turns out" in everything, something funny appears in everything. Even in Russian pornography, unlike, say, German, there is a humorous moment.

Laughter culture blocks"Shooters" and what Malakhov shows. But work in this direction is ongoing - for example, when they show me a woman whose children have been burned to death, and they try to say that this is the norm, these are declassed, desocialized people. Who does it affect? First of all, on our liberal intelligentsia, which wants to believe in it. From many of my acquaintances, I see one of the specific features of our liberal intelligentsia - dislike of Russian life, fear of it, as a kind of irrationality. Often this comes from childhood: he left the house on the street with a sandwich - "got it in the ear" - and for the rest of his life he disliked the street. I deliberately reduce everything to a primitive level, but I can argue that the basis of the rejection of Soviet society by our liberal intelligentsia, as far as I remember from conversations with our half-dissidents, lay rejection of the Russian style, the Russian way of life. I have a friend, a kind of pro-NATO, who wants us to be like in America. But 90% of society does not want to live like this. She considers herself to be among the remaining 10. I would recommend her to go there and live there.

A question from the audience: is this not Novodvorskaya? Fursov's answer: no, he is a more significant person, and therefore more harmful in his activities. Novodvorskaya, in fact, is a harmless woman who compromises what she says. There are more serious people. I recommend reading the article by Elena Ponomareva, professor at MGIMO, on the Strategic Culture Foundation website. "How agents of influence are trained" where she calls everyone by surname in spite of her problems in this regard. There are also good articles by Olga Chetverikova, who wrote the book Treason in the Vatican. It tells about the essence of the Vatican as a financial and intelligence corporation. And Ponomareva will soon publish a book promising to become a political thriller - "Kosovo, NATO and the Mafia"... There is also on that site one of her last articles dedicated to Z. Brzezinski. In it, Ponomareva pushed away from Brzezinski's interview given to Konstantin Eggert.

Eggert- this is my junior colleague at the Institute of Asian and African Countries (ISAA MSU), enemy of Russia, worked for BBC, has British orders and in principle does not accept our life. He does not understand that we cannot have, as in the West, because everything is different here. Both the Chinese and the Indians will not have a Western style, for, as the late A.A. Zinoviev, "The evolution of complex social systems is irreversible" ... The system may break. Pay attention to how resilient it turned out to be what was created during the Soviet era. I am actively involved in the problem of education. Over the past ten years, it has been simply destroyed. Until the end, it has not yet been destroyed, although I can see the difference.

Since 1972 I have been teaching at Moscow University. For ten years after 1991, it was still a Soviet school. Somewhere from 2005-2006, a turning point occurred - this can be seen in all areas. On the 4th of November of this year, the announcer of Channel 1 of TV says: "400 years ago, the militia of Minin and Pozharsky came to Moscow and overthrew False Dmitry I ..." Actually, by 1612 both False Dmitry I and False Dmitry II were already dead. Neither the announcer nor the one who wrote this text to him knows about this. These are the fruits of the "Unified State Examination" education.

I prefer to deal with online journalists - they are advanced guys. And I practically stopped doing business with TV and radio journalists. Radio journalists are nothing. Young guys (25-26 years old) themselves say that they do not know much, they did not study at school. But on the whole, the system has not yet been broken, it turned out to be strong, and we still live at its expense. When former President Medvedev at one time criticized Stalinism, it did not occur to him that the achievements of Stalinism were an atomic bomb, nuclear weapon- this is exactly why they sit down with him at the same table. Otherwise, the conversation would have been completely different - as with

The success of "color revolutions" is 80 percent dependent on the human factor. "The more professionals there are in the ranks of the conspirators, the more people there are in the enemy's camp (informants, 'figures of influence', accomplices), the higher their chances of success." That is why the role and significance of the human factor in the "color revolutions" is enormous. But where do the local “color” enthusiasts and coordinators come from? Why are they willing to work against their country with foreign money?
In fact, everything is very simple: the most important players of the CR are recruited. As one of the ideologues of the Illuminati, the German writer Baron Adolph von Knigge, who lived in the 18th century, said, "everything can be done from a person, you just have to approach him from the weak side." The recruitment process includes three main stages of working with the "object".

First stage can be conditionally called "identification". Based on what kind of information is required to be obtained (or what actions are required to be provided), all persons possessing such information (capable of taking the necessary actions) are identified. Among them, the most desirable for recruitment are determined. And already from this circle of persons, several (at least one) are selected as objects of the latter.

Second phase- choice of recruitment methods. Having thoroughly studied the "objects", they are given an extremely accurate political and moral-psychological assessment in order to determine their "pain points", as well as methods of pressure on these points and the permissible limits of such pressure.

Stage three- "development", that is, the recruitment process itself. The recruitment operation is a fairly long cycle that requires high level intellectual support. At its first stage the main role informants and analysts play. Their task is to find those people who meet the above requirements (conditions). At the same time, the most interesting for the conspirators are the leaders of the middle and top echelons of management of the security organs and the armed forces, as well as plenipotentiary figures in the power structures.

No less, and sometimes even more, is the recruitment of workers on the "ideological front" - journalists, scientists, publicists, and now bloggers who consider themselves to be the intelligentsia. In Russia, in all revolutions without exception, the intelligentsia played a special role. As SN Bulgakov wrote, the revolution is "the spiritual brainchild of the intelligentsia." I will cite just some facts of the close work of the Russian opposition under the "roof" of Western services.
On December 23, 2002, the National Passport Center in Portsmouth (USA) issued a passport number 710160620 to one of the oldest "fighters against the regime" in Russia, Lyudmila Alekseeva. In addition to granting American citizenship, the facts of financing the activities of this "revolutionary" are much more important. In particular, its activity is paid for by the Ford and MacArthur Foundations, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Open Society Institute in a company with the European Union. Only last year, the NED, already mentioned in the previous article, allocated two grants to the US citizen L. Alekseeva for her work in Russia, totaling 105 thousand dollars. In addition to cash injections from American foundations, which receive hundreds of nongovernmental organizations established in Russia, so-called vanity mechanisms are used. For example, the right person you can be invited to meetings of the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Club (A. Chubais, L. Shevtsov, E. Yasin) or give the position of a leading researcher, say, the Royal Institute of International Relations - better known as Chatham House (L. Shevtsova).
In this row is A. Navalny's "hit" in the list of the 100 most influential persons in the world according to the magazine "Time". The same list includes US President B. Obama and his main rival in the 2012 elections M. Romney, German Chancellor A. Merkel, Iranian spiritual leader Ayatollah A. Khamenei, IMF head K. Lagarde, investor W. Buffett.
The company, as they say, is what you need. Moreover, the magazine does not distribute the persons involved in its hundreds of influence in places and does not assign ratings, which further adds to the significance of getting into it. Navalny's personality deserves more attention.
In 2006, the project "Yes!" Navalny and Masha Gaidar started funding the NED. After that, the most famous blogger in Russia today accumulated, as some of his biographers suggest, on the Internet trade 40 thousand dollars (in his own words), for which he bought several shares in a number of large Russian companies with a high share of state ownership. So Navalny received the status of a minority shareholder and a platform for his anti-corruption investigations. Under very strange circumstances, in 2010, Navalny was admitted to study at Yale University under the Yale World Fellows program. Out of more than a thousand applicants, only 20 people were selected - presumably, the most promising.
The faculty included Lord Malloch-Brown, a veteran of the British Foreign Office, and staff of the Open Society Institute. Funded by World Fellows by the Starr Foundation Maurice R. ("Hank") Greenberg, the former president of the American International Group (AIG) insurance giant, which has received a huge infusion from George W. Bush. and B. Obama in 2008-2009. According to experts from the Executive Intelligence Review led by L. LaRouche, Greenberg and his firm C.V. Starr has been engaged in "regime change" (coups) for a very long time, since the overthrow of President Marcos in the Philippines in 1986 .
Navalny himself writes that she advised him to apply for participation in the Masha Gaidar program, and he received recommendations from leading professors High school economy in Moscow . By the way, Navalny began his anti-corruption campaign against Transneft from New Haven (that is, directly from Yale University) ... Interesting remarks about Navalny's psychotype. So, in public, he gives the impression of a split personality, and online - openness itself. At the same time, when his mailbox on the gmail.com portal was hacked and his correspondence with the US Embassy and The National Fund support for democracy, regarding his funding, he admitted that the letters are genuine. He tries to disarm his interlocutors with questions like "Do you think that I work for the Americans or for the Kremlin?" Most likely, it will turn out to be an expendable material for its sponsors, but so far the activities of Navalny and his closest "associates" look like an excellent illustration of J. Sharp's manual.
However, back to the recruitment process. The Americans have developed a unique and highly effective recruiting formula - MICE. Its name is derived from the first letters of the words: "Money - Ideology - Compromise - Ego" ).
It is obvious that inside any social group you can identify a sufficient number of people dissatisfied with the existing state of affairs, in fact, are in opposition to the authorities. In moral and psychological terms, they are all suitable for recruitment, the only question is which of these people the recruiters need. Finally, after the object of recruitment has been identified and thoroughly studied, the recruiter itself comes into play. Thanks to his work, the scriptwriters of the CR can gain access to secret political, economic and military information, as well as create a "lighthouse", a center of attraction for all disaffected. As for the very process of finding the "right" people, there are several mandatory rules in this matter.
For example, back in 1973, the US Department of Defense issued an instruction entitled “The Anti-Dissident Program,” which lists the traits that define a dissident. With its help, it is possible to identify potential targets for recruitment among military personnel not only in the United States, but also in other countries. Here are some signs of "dissidents" among the military: - frequent complaints to sergeants, officers, journalists or congressmen about living conditions, unfair treatment, etc .; - attempts to address, bypassing the immediate superiors, to someone with stories about their problems; - participation in unauthorized meetings, the creation of groups for the expression of collective protests, participation in demonstrations, in agitation, simulation of diseases; - frequent minor acts of disobedience or insolence, for example, evading a military salute, slow execution of orders, etc.; - unauthorized admission to military premises of civilians or attendance at their rallies outside the unit; - distribution of clandestine or prohibited print media; - dissident inscriptions made secretly on buildings, vehicles, property; - destruction or damage to state (military) property; - defiant behavior in connection with the presentation of symbols of power (for example, when playing the national anthem, taking out the flag, speaking by top officials of the state on television or radio, etc.); - fanning small incidents, exaggerating their scale and consequences, spreading rumors.
Similar criteria for identifying "dissidents" exist in relation to purely civilians. 2006, when the new mistress of the US State Department, K. Rice, announced the new political tasks of her department, can be considered a milestone in the activation of the United States' work with disaffected in target countries. Since then, one of the most important responsibilities of every American diplomat has been to "involve foreign nationals and the media in promoting US interests abroad."
Thus, back in 2006, the requirement for direct interference in the internal affairs of the host state was officially introduced into the practice of American diplomacy. Now American diplomats must "not only analyze policy and determine its outcome, but also implement programs ... to help foreign citizens develop democracy building, fight corruption, start businesses, improve health care and reform education."
So you shouldn't be surprised at the behavior of M. McFaul - he is following the instructions of the US Department of State and pursuing the interests of his country. At the same time, Russia, like any other sovereign state, has the right to defend its interests. And with all the means available to this state. Including the suppression of the activities of the "fifth column", dissidents and objectionable diplomats. Is a "color revolution" possible in Russia? "Color revolutions" do not happen by themselves, without the presence of appropriate prerequisites and without the required conditions, but most importantly - without serious preparation and substantial efforts. Therefore, in order to answer the question "Is a" color revolution possible in Russia? " Only the most complete and exhaustive knowledge about the situation in the country, about the existing problems and challenges can enable the authorities to effectively fight the "color" tsunamis.
Moreover, in this case, we are talking not only about strict state control over the activities of Western funds engaged in subversive activities on the territory of Russia. But first of all - about serious changes in the model of the country's development, since only in this way can the “revolutionaries” be deprived of support. If there are prerequisites, then theoretically in any state it is possible to implement the CR scenario, in the absence of these, consideration of such a course of events, even hypothetically, is meaningless. The conditions, however, transfer the possibility of the emergence of the "color revolution" and its success from a theoretical plane to a practical one.
"Color revolutions" do not happen by themselves, without the presence of appropriate prerequisites and without the required conditions, but most importantly - without serious preparation and substantial efforts.
If these conditions are not enough, then the CR will remain a potential opportunity for tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, and not a factor in current politics today. Among the internal prerequisites and conditions of the CR, the following can be singled out: - "an authoritarian or pseudo-democratic state system, which significantly limits the possibilities of entering the dominant social force and the ruling group of representatives of various social groups"; - the presence of a wide segment of the population dissatisfied with the existing order, the so-called base group, from which participants in mass non-violent events are recruited; - dissatisfaction of the majority of the population with the level of benefits and opportunities offered by the ruling group, within the framework of the existing social, political and economic structure, in comparison with the expected ones.
In this case, the population actively or passively supports the idea of a “color revolution”; - Absence or weak control on the part of the authorities over the main sources of CRs - NGOs, mass media, Internet resources; - the presence in the ruling group of supporters of the "color revolution" and a strong single opposition center headed by authoritative leaders; - lack of legitimate political leader capable of uniting the healthy forces of society against the CR virus. IN currently Russia does not have this set of conditions. As some analysts rightly point out, the ability of the leaders of the “colored” movement in Russia to organize large-scale, long-term and coordinated mass actions also raises great doubts. Thus, it can be argued with a certain degree of certainty that at present there is no base group for CRs in Russia. In addition, supporters of "color" changes do not have a wide representation in the domestic state apparatus. At the same time, the country has serious social and economic problems. And the possibility of a new "color" pressure depends on the degree and speed of their solution. More than two thousand years ago, the Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu said: "You need to bring order when there is still no turmoil." Obviously, this statement characterizes modernity in the best possible way. If the state is in order, then the realization of the interests of external interests is not afraid of it. If this order does not exist, then the viruses of the revolution have fertile soil. It breaks where it is thin. Perhaps this is the most important secret of the "color revolutions".

.
Elena Ponomareva

For most Russians who follow the ups and downs of world politics, it would probably be difficult to name a figure more odious in their eyes than Zbigniew Brzezinski, because of the deep-seated dislike of this American of Polish-Jewish origin for Russia, his downright pathological Russophobia. John Kenneth Galbraith once very accurately defined: "Brzezinski's favorite hobby is to harm Russia" ... (1)

Despite his advanced age (in March 2012 the Big Zbig celebrated its 84th birthday), he continues to indulge in his favorite hobby with passion. However, even this is not striking. It is striking that in Russia, against which he devoted his whole life, his books are published in thousands of copies, are reprinted, (2) that he is invited to Russia to some forums, and many Russian media accept him with open arms. A few days ago, Russian citizens were introduced to the text of Brzezinski's intimate conversation with the international commentator of the Moscow radio station Kommersant-FM Konstantin von Eggert. (3)

And here it is necessary to give a few words to the interviewer. The figure is specific. This graduate of the Institute of Asian and African Countries, Moscow State University in 1998-2009. worked in the Moscow bureau of the Russian service of the BBC, including in the place of the editor-in-chief. He is nestled at Chatham House, London's Royal Institute of International Relations, and is a member of the editorial board of Pro et Contra magazine, published by the Moscow office of the Carnegie Endowment. In 2009-2010. He was vice president of the American oil and gas company Exxon Mobil Russia Inc. (this is a journalist!). In 2008, apparently, for his devotion to free journalism, he was awarded the title of Honorary Member of the Civilian Division of the Order of the British Empire, and Lithuanian President Valdas Adamkus awarded him the Commander's Cross "For Merit to Lithuania" (?!). In Russia, this servant of the British crown prefers not to mention his nobility (background), but in the West he is extremely proud of them. In 2010 Eggert was elected President of the British Alumni Club, established in 1998 in Moscow. The club is also specific: it unites Russian graduates of British educational institutions and operates with the financial and informational support of the British Council and the British Embassy in Russia. (four)

The figure of Eggert deserves special attention because he purposefully drives into the consciousness of Russians the feeling of their national inferiority, failure, historical guilt, and worthlessness. That is, it is working to undermine the foundations of Russian statehood. Here are some of the samples of his work: "Unwillingness to settle with the shameful past turns out to be one of the reasons for the faded present and foggy future"; (5) “Voluntarily or involuntarily, we remain the heirs of Lenin-Stalin-Brezhnev, the GULAG and queues for sausages, the war in Afghanistan and communal life. Because we don't have the strength to admit to ourselves that, with the exception of the victory in the war and the flight of Gagarin, and maybe two or three more names like Shostakovich, the 20th century is a lost century for Russia. " (6)

Along with the repetition of these vulgarities from the times of the late Gorbachev, Eggert also speaks about the future of Russia. The project of the Eurasian Economic Union evokes a particularly nervous reaction in him. In particular, this British Club member calls the strategic alliance between Russia and Belarus nothing more than "unbearably shameful." (7)

So, it was Konstantin Eggert who was honored to interview the main Russophobe of our time. How did the Big Zbig please the attentive Russian audience this time? In general, for more than half a century, his rhetoric has not changed. I will remind you of something.

And hence the main question: what should be done so that the United States retains its "global leadership"? The answer for those familiar with many years of Brzezinski's activity may seem unexpected. Russophobe offers

The topic of USAID's “withdrawal” from our political space opens many eyes to the fact that this organization was not at all engaged in “good deeds” on the territory of our country. Recently I happened to become a listener of the Vesti.FM broadcast just on this topic. Among the guests in the studio was MGIMO professor, doctor of political sciences Elena Ponomareva. It is interesting to hear such an authoritative person for the first time in my life and to realize how similar her position is. As usual, the USAID leadership is all former CIA and NATO members. And, of course, most of all they want to “help” the people of Russia to achieve a “bright future”.

Recently, the publication of Elena in the magazine "Free Thought" called "Secrets of" color revolutions "... It describes in some detail the scheme of how “protest leaders” are recruited for the purpose of subsequent manipulation of public opinion and implementation of well-known scenarios.

Below is a snippet of how agents of influence are recruited:

The human factor of "color revolutions"

In fact, everything is very simple: the most important players of the CR are recruited. As one of the ideologues of the Illuminati, the German writer Baron Adolph von Knigge, who lived in the 18th century, said, "everything can be done from a person, you just have to approach him from the weak side." The recruitment process includes three main stages of working with the "object".

The first stage can be conventionally called "identification". Based on what kind of information is required to be obtained (or what actions are required to be provided), all persons possessing such information (capable of taking the necessary actions) are identified. Among them, the most desirable for recruitment are determined. And already from this circle of persons, several (at least one) are selected as objects of the latter.

The second stage is the choice of recruiting methods. Having thoroughly studied the "objects", they are given an extremely accurate political and moral-psychological assessment in order to determine their "pain points", as well as methods of pressure on these points and the permissible limits of such pressure.

The third stage is "development", that is, the recruitment process itself. The recruiting operation is a rather long cycle that requires a high level of intellectual support. At the first stage, informants and analysts play the main role. Their task is to find those people who meet the above requirements (conditions). At the same time, the most interesting for the conspirators are the leaders of the middle and top echelons of management of the security organs and the armed forces, as well as plenipotentiary figures in power structures18 No less, and sometimes even more, is the recruitment of workers from the “ideological front” - journalists, scientists, publicists, and now bloggers who consider themselves to be the intelligentsia. In Russia, in all revolutions without exception, the intelligentsia played a special role. As SN Bulgakov wrote, the revolution is "the spiritual brainchild of the intelligentsia." I will cite just some facts of the close work of the Russian opposition under the "roof" of Western services.

On December 23, 2002, the National Passport Center in Portsmouth (USA) issued a passport number 710160620 to one of the oldest "fighters against the regime" in Russia, Lyudmila Alekseeva. In addition to granting American citizenship, the facts of financing the activities of this "revolutionary" are much more important. In particular, its activity is paid for by the Ford and MacArthur Foundations, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Open Society Institute in a company with the European Union. Only last year, the NED, already mentioned in the previous article20, allocated two grants to the US citizen L. Alekseeva for her work in Russia, totaling 105 thousand dollars21. In addition to cash injections from American foundations, which receive hundreds of nongovernmental organizations established in Russia, so-called vanity mechanisms are used. For example, the right person can be invited to meetings of the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Club (A. Chubais, L. Shevtsova, E. Yasin) or given the position of a leading researcher, say, the Royal Institute of International Relations - better known as Chatham House (L. Shevtsova) ...

In this row is A. Navalny's "hit" in the list of the 100 most influential persons in the world according to the magazine "Time". The same list includes US President B. Obama and his main rival in the 2012 elections M. Romney, German Chancellor A. Merkel, Iranian spiritual leader Ayatollah A. Khamenei, IMF head K. Lagarde, investor W. Buffett.

The company, as they say, is what you need. Moreover, the magazine does not distribute the persons involved in its hundreds of influence in places and does not assign ratings, which further adds to the significance of getting into it. Navalny's personality deserves more attention.

In 2006, the project "Yes!" Navalny and Masha Gaidar started funding the NED. After that, the most famous blogger in Russia today accumulated, as some of his biographers suggest, on the Internet trade 40 thousand dollars (in his own words), for which he bought several shares in a number of large Russian companies with a high share of state ownership. So Navalny received the status of a minority shareholder and a platform for his anti-corruption investigations. Under very strange circumstances, in 2010, Navalny was admitted to study at Yale University under the Yale World Fellows program. Out of more than a thousand applicants, only 20 people were selected - presumably, the most promising.

The faculty included Lord Malloch-Brown, a veteran of the British Foreign Office, and staff of the Open Society Institute. Funded by World Fellows by the Starr Foundation Maurice R. ("Hank") Greenberg, the former president of the American International Group (AIG) insurance giant, which has received a huge infusion from George W. Bush. and B. Obama in 2008-2009. According to experts from the Executive Intelligence Review led by L. LaRouche, Greenberg and his firm C.V. Starr has been involved in "regime change" (coups) for a very long time, beginning with the overthrow of President Marcos in the Philippines in 1986.

Navalny himself writes that she advised him to apply for participation in the Masha Gaidar program, and he received recommendations from leading professors at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow. By the way, Navalny began his anti-corruption campaign against Transneft from New Haven (that is, directly from Yale University) .23 Interesting remarks about Navalny's psychotype. So, in public, he gives the impression of a split personality, and online - openness itself. However, when his gmail.com mailbox was hacked and correspondence with the US Embassy and the National Endowment for Democracy was published regarding his funding, he admitted that the letters were genuine. He tries to disarm his interlocutors with questions like "Do you think that I work for the Americans or for the Kremlin?" Most likely, it will turn out to be an expendable material for its sponsors, but so far the activities of Navalny and his closest "associates" look like an excellent illustration of J. Sharp's manual.

However, back to the recruitment process. The Americans have developed a unique and highly effective recruiting formula - MICE. Its name is derived from the first letters of the words: "Money - Ideology - Compromise - Ego" ("Money - Ideology - Compromising evidence - Ego").

It is obvious that within any social group it is possible to identify a sufficient number of people dissatisfied with the existing state of affairs, in fact, are in opposition to the authorities. In moral and psychological terms, they are all suitable for recruitment, the only question is which of these people the recruiters need. Finally, after the object of recruitment has been identified and thoroughly studied, the recruiter itself comes into play. Thanks to his work, the scriptwriters of the CR can gain access to secret political, economic and military information, as well as create a "lighthouse", a center of attraction for all disaffected. As for the very process of finding the "right" people, there are several mandatory rules in this matter.

For example, back in 1973, the US Department of Defense issued an instruction entitled “The Anti-Dissident Program,” which lists the traits that define a dissident. With its help, it is possible to identify potential targets for recruitment among military personnel not only in the United States, but also in other countries. Here are some signs of "dissidents" among the military: - frequent complaints to sergeants, officers, journalists or congressmen about living conditions, unfair treatment, etc .; - attempts to address, bypassing the immediate superiors, to someone with stories about their problems; - participation in unauthorized meetings, the creation of groups for the expression of collective protests, participation in demonstrations, in agitation, simulation of diseases; - frequent minor acts of disobedience or insolence, for example, evading a military salute, slow execution of orders, etc.; - unauthorized admission of civilians to military premises or attendance at their rallies outside the unit; - distribution of clandestine or prohibited print media; - dissident inscriptions made secretly on buildings, vehicles, property; - destruction or damage to state (military) property; - defiant behavior in connection with the presentation of symbols of power (for example, when playing the national anthem, taking out the flag, speaking by top officials of the state on television or radio, etc.); - fanning small incidents, exaggerating their scale and consequences, spreading rumors.

Similar criteria for identifying "dissidents" exist in relation to purely civilians. 2006, when the new mistress of the US State Department, K. Rice, announced the new political tasks of her department, can be considered a milestone in the activation of the United States' work with disaffected in target countries. Since then, one of the most important responsibilities of every American diplomat has been to "involve foreign nationals and the media in promoting US interests abroad."

Thus, back in 2006, the requirement for direct interference in the internal affairs of the host state was officially introduced into the practice of American diplomacy. Now American diplomats must "not only analyze policy and determine its outcome, but also implement programs ... to help foreign citizens develop democracy building, fight corruption, start businesses, improve health care and reform education."

So you shouldn't be surprised at the behavior of M. McFaul - he is following the instructions of the US Department of State and pursuing the interests of his country. At the same time, Russia, like any other sovereign state, has the right to defend its interests. And with all the means available to this state. Including the suppression of the activities of the "fifth column", dissidents and objectionable diplomats. Is a "color revolution" possible in Russia? "Color revolutions" do not happen by themselves, without the presence of appropriate prerequisites and without the required conditions, but most importantly - without serious preparation and significant efforts. Therefore, in order to answer the question "Is a" color revolution possible in Russia? " Only the most complete and exhaustive knowledge about the situation in the country, about the existing problems and challenges can enable the authorities to effectively fight the "color" tsunamis.

Moreover, in this case we are talking not only about strict state control over the activities of Western foundations engaged in subversive activities on the territory of Russia. But first of all - about serious changes in the model of the country's development, since only in this way can the “revolutionaries” be deprived of support. If there are prerequisites, then theoretically in any state it is possible to implement the CR scenario, in the absence of these, consideration of such a course of events, even hypothetically, is meaningless. The conditions, however, translate the possibility of the emergence of the "color revolution" and its success from a theoretical plane to a practical one.

If these conditions are not enough, then the CR will remain a potential opportunity for tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, and not a factor in current politics today. Among the internal prerequisites and conditions of the CR, the following can be singled out: - "an authoritarian or pseudo-democratic state system, which significantly limits the possibilities of entering the dominant social force and the ruling group of representatives of various social groups" 29; - the presence of a wide segment of the population dissatisfied with the existing order, the so-called base group, from which participants in mass non-violent events are recruited; - dissatisfaction of the majority of the population with the level of benefits and opportunities offered by the ruling group, within the framework of the existing social, political and economic structure, in comparison with the expected ones.

In this case, the population actively or passively supports the idea of a “color revolution”; - Absence or weak control on the part of the authorities over the main sources of CRs - NGOs, mass media, Internet resources; - the presence in the ruling group of supporters of the "color revolution" and a strong single opposition center headed by authoritative leaders; - the lack of a legitimate political leader capable of uniting the healthy forces of society against the CR virus. At the moment, Russia does not have this set of conditions. As some analysts rightly point out, the ability of the leaders of the “colored” movement in Russia to organize large-scale, long-term and coordinated mass actions also raises great doubts. Thus, it can be argued with a certain degree of certainty that at present there is no base group for CRs in Russia. In addition, supporters of "color" changes do not have a wide representation in the domestic state apparatus. At the same time, the country has serious social and economic problems. And the possibility of a new "color" pressure depends on the degree and speed of their solution. More than two thousand years ago, the Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu said: "You need to bring order when there is still no turmoil." Obviously, this statement characterizes modernity in the best possible way. If there is order in the state, then the realization of the interests of external interested parties is not afraid of it. If this order does not exist, then the viruses of the revolution have fertile soil. It breaks where it is thin. Perhaps this is the most important secret of the "color revolutions".

Elena Ponomareva

Below is a fragment of how agents of influence are recruited.

The human factor of "color revolutions"

The success of "color revolutions" is 80% dependent on the human factor. "The more professionals there are in the ranks of the conspirators, the more of their own people in the enemy's camp (informants," figures of influence ", accomplices), the higher their chances of success."... That is why the role and significance of the human factor in the "color revolutions" is enormous. But where do they come from local “color” enthusiasts and coordinators? Why are they ready to work for foreign money? against their country?

In fact, everything is very simple: the most important players of the CR recruiting... As one of the ideologues of the Illuminati, the German writer Baron Adolph von Knigge, who lived in the 18th century, said, "Everything can be done out of a person, you just have to approach him from the weak side"... The recruitment process includes 3 main stages of working with the "object".

Second phase- choice of recruitment methods. Having comprehensively studied the "objects", they are given an extremely accurate political and moral-psychological assessment in order to determine their "pain points", as well as methods of pressure on these points and the permissible limits of such pressure.

Stage three- "development", that is, the recruitment process itself. The recruiting operation is a rather long cycle that requires a high level of intellectual support. At its first stage, informants and analysts play the main role. Their task is to find those people who meet the above requirements (conditions). At the same time, the most interesting for the conspirators are the heads of the middle and top echelons of the management of security agencies and armed forces as well as plenipotentiary figures in power structures. No less, and sometimes even more, is the recruitment of workers on the "ideological front" - journalists, scientists, publicists, and now bloggers who consider themselves to be the intelligentsia. In Russia, in all revolutions without exception, the intelligentsia played a special role. As S.N. Bulgakov, the revolution is "the spiritual brainchild of the intelligentsia." Here are just some of the facts of close work. Russian opposition under the "roof" of Western services.

December 23, 2002 by the National Passport Center in Portsmouth (USA) to one of the oldest "fighters against the regime" in Russia Lyudmila Alekseeva a passport number 710160620 was issued. In addition to granting American citizenship, the facts of financing the activities of this "revolutionary" are much more important. In particular, its activity is paid for by the Ford and MacArthur Foundations, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Open Society Institute in a company with the European Union. Only last year NED, already mentioned in the previous article, allocated two grants to the US citizen L. Alekseeva for her work in Russia for a total amount of 105 thousand dollars.

In addition to cash injections from American funds that receive hundreds of non-governmental organizations created in Russia, the so-called vanity mechanisms are used. For example, the right person can be invited to meetings of the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Club (A. Chubais, L. Shevtsova, E. Yasin) or given the position of a leading researcher, say, the Royal Institute of International Relations - better known as Chatham House (L. Shevtsova) ...

In this row there is also a "hit" A. Navalny to the list of 100 most influential people in the world according to the magazine "Time"... The same list includes US President B. Obama and his main rival in the 2012 elections M. Romney, German Chancellor A. Merkel, Iranian spiritual leader Ayatollah A. Khamenei, IMF head K. Lagarde, investor W. Buffett. The company, as they say, is what you need. Moreover, the magazine does not distribute the persons involved in its hundreds of influence in places and does not assign ratings, which further adds to the significance of getting into it. Navalny's personality deserves more attention.

In 2006, the project "Yes!" Navalny and Masha Gaidar started funding NED... After that, the most famous blogger in Russia today accumulated, as some of his biographers suggest, on the Internet trade 40 thousand dollars (in his own words), for which he bought several shares in a number of large Russian companies with a high share of state ownership. So Navalny received the status of a minority shareholder and a platform for his anti-corruption investigations. Under very strange circumstances, in 2010, Navalny was admitted to study at Yale University under the program "Yale World Fellows"... Out of more than a thousand applicants, only 20 people were selected - presumably, the most promising.

The faculty included Lord Malloch-Brown, a veteran of the British Foreign Office, and staff of the Open Society Institute. Funded by World Fellows By the Starr Foundation Maurice R. ("Hank") Greenberg, the former president of the insurance giant American International Group (AIG), who received gigantic infusions from George W. Bush. and B. Obama in 2008-2009. According to experts Executive Intelligence Review under the leadership of L. LaRouche, Greenberg and his firm "C.V. Starr " are engaged "Change of modes"(coups) has been around for a very long time, since the overthrow of President Marcos in the Philippines in 1986.

Interesting remarks about Navalny's psychotype. So, in public, he gives the impression of a split personality, and online - openness itself. However, when his mailbox on the portal was hacked gmail.com and published correspondence with the US Embassy and the National Endowment for Democracy regarding its funding, he acknowledged that the letters were genuine. He tries to disarm his interlocutors with questions like "Do you think that I work for the Americans or for the Kremlin?" Most likely, it will turn out to be for its sponsors consumable, but so far the activities of Navalny and his closest "associates" look like an excellent illustration of J. Sharp's manual.

However, back to recruitment process... Americans have developed a unique and highly effective recruiting formula - MICE... Its name is derived from the first letters of the words: "Money - Ideology - Compromise - Ego"("Money - Ideology - Compromising evidence - Ego").

Obviously, within any social group, you can identify a sufficient number of people dissatisfied with the existing state of affairs, in fact, are in opposition to the authorities. In moral and psychological terms, they are all suitable for recruitment, the only question is which of these people the recruiters need. Finally, after the object of recruitment has been identified and thoroughly studied, the recruiter itself comes into play. Thanks to his work, the scriptwriters of the CR can be given access to secret political, economic and military information, as well as a "beacon", a center of attraction for all disaffected, can be created. As for the very process of finding the "right" people, there are several mandatory rules in this matter.

For example, back in 1973, the US Department of Defense issued an instruction entitled “Anti-Dissident Program,” which lists the traits that define a dissident. With its help, it is possible to identify potential targets for recruitment among military personnel not only in the United States, but also in other countries. Here are some signs of "dissidents" among the military:

frequent complaints to sergeants, officers, journalists or congressmen about living conditions, unfair treatment, etc .;
attempts to address, bypassing the immediate superiors, to someone with stories about their problems;
participation in unauthorized meetings, the creation of groups for the expression of collective protests, participation in demonstrations, in agitation, simulation of diseases;
frequent minor acts of disobedience or insolence, for example, evading a military salute, slow execution of orders, etc.;
unauthorized admission of civilians to military premises or attendance at their meetings outside the unit;
distribution of clandestine or prohibited print media;
dissident inscriptions made secretly on buildings, vehicles, property;
destruction or damage to state (military) property;
defiant behavior in connection with the presentation of symbols of power (for example, when performing the national anthem, taking out the flag, speaking by top officials of the state on television or radio, etc.);
fanning small incidents, exaggerating their scale and consequences, spreading rumors.

Similar criteria for identifying "dissidents" exist in relation to purely civilians. 2006, when the new mistress of the US Department of State K. Rice announced new political tasks of their department... Since then, one of the most important responsibilities of every American diplomat has been "Involving foreign nationals and the media in promoting US interests abroad".

Thus, back in 2006, the requirement for direct interference in the internal affairs of the host state was officially introduced into the practice of American diplomacy. Now American diplomats must "Not only analyze policy and determine its outcome, but also implement programs ... to help foreign citizens develop democracy building, fight corruption, open businesses, improve health care and reform education".

Is a "color revolution" possible in Russia?

"Color revolutions" don't happen by themselves, without the presence of the appropriate prerequisites and without the required conditions, but most importantly - without serious preparation and significant efforts. Therefore, in order to answer the question "Is a" color revolution possible in Russia? " Only the most complete and comprehensive knowledge of the situation in the country, about the existing problems and challenges can enable the authorities to effectively deal with the "color" tsunamis.

Moreover, in this case we are talking not only about strict state control over the activities of Western funds engaged in subversive activities on the territory of Russia. But, first of all, about serious changes in the model of the country's development, since only in this way can the “revolutionaries” be deprived of support.

If there are prerequisites, then theoretically in any state the implementation of the CR scenario is possible. In the absence of these, consideration of such a course of events, even hypothetically, is meaningless. The conditions, however, translate the possibility of the emergence of a "color revolution" and its success from a theoretical plane to a practical one.

"Color revolutions" do not happen by themselves, without the presence of appropriate prerequisites and without the required conditions, but most importantly - without serious preparation and substantial efforts. If these conditions are not enough, then the CR will remain so potential opportunity tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, and not a factor of actual politics today.

Among the internal prerequisites and conditions of the CR, the following can be distinguished:

"An authoritarian or pseudo-democratic state system, which significantly limits the possibilities of entering the dominant social force and the ruling group of representatives of various social groups";
the presence of a wide segment of the population dissatisfied with the existing order, the so-called base group, from which participants in mass non-violent events are recruited;
dissatisfaction of the majority of the population with the level of benefits and opportunities offered by the ruling group, within the framework of the existing social, political and economic structure, in comparison with the expected ones. In this case, the population actively or passively supports the idea of a “color revolution”;
absence or weak control on the part of the authorities over the main sources of the CR - NGOs, mass media, Internet resources;
the presence in the ruling group of supporters of the "color revolution" and a strong united opposition center headed by authoritative leaders;
lack of a legitimate political leader capable of uniting the healthy forces of society against the CR virus.

At present Russia does not have this set of conditions... As some analysts rightly point out, the ability of the leaders of the “colored” movement in Russia to organize large-scale, long-term and coordinated mass actions also raises great doubts. Thus, it can be argued with a certain degree of certainty that at present there is no base group for CRs in Russia. In addition, supporters of "color" changes do not have a wide representation in the domestic state apparatus.

At the same time, the country has serious social and economic problems. And the possibility of a new "color" pressure depends on the degree and speed of their solution. More than two thousand years ago, the Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu said: "It is necessary to put things in order when there is still no turmoil"... Obviously, this statement characterizes modernity in the best possible way. If there is order in the state, then the realization of the interests of external interested parties is not afraid of it. If this order does not exist, then the viruses of the revolution have fertile soil. It breaks where it is thin. Perhaps this is the most important secret of the "color revolutions".