Khazin delyagin. “new democracy” by M. G. Delyagin and M. L. hazina is the party of the goal or the next party of the slogan. About the trap for those traveling abroad

A joint report of the Mikhail Khazin Foundation for Economic Research and the Institute for Globalization Problems has been published" NEW DEMOCRACY:what should be a successful political project”.http://worldcrisis.ru/crisis/1852930?COMEFROM=SUBSCREdited by M.G. Delyagin and M.L. Khazin. Since two not the last foundations in Russia took part in writing the report, it is of interest to see how the proposed party political system does it fit into the existing economic platforms, is it going to occupy a certain niche in the electoral field and get a seat in the legislature, i.е. be another batch of slogans or it will offer citizens something new that will allow them to avoid problems with the technological singularity. The review will be based on the work "Fundamentals of the Theory of Economic Systems", published by LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing in 2014, as well as the articles " SECRETS OF CHINESE ECONOMIC CUISINE»

http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/rus/catalog/pages/14509.html and

THIRD MOSCOW ECONOMIC FORUM - "ONE YEAR AFTER THE SECOND"

http :// perevodika . ru / articles / 26999. html.

Like any project, the authors begin it with a description of the modern political system “... not only in Russia, but also in developed (not to mention undeveloped) countries political parties, expressing the common interests of global business, have therefore become hardly distinguishable from one another and cause more and more electoral irritation. At the same time, judging by the text, only the capitalist system is considered, and from the standpoint of the economy, this is a crisis system. The mistake is that it does not take into account the fact that there are two political systems based on two different economic platforms: the platform of A. Smith - this system is considered by the authors and the platform of V. I. Lenin - this system is considered casually, without presenting its structure. It is the economic successes of this (on the platform of V. I. Lenin) political system currently and "… cause more and more electoral irritation. This is due to the fact that the economy on this platform develops without crises, and on the platform of A. Smith it does not come out of them - even in the 21st century, the current crisis is the third.

As for the "middle class", its impoverishment in the future is associated with two factors - a further increase in labor productivity (in its classical sense) and the development of competition - the satisfaction of the selfish needs of the owners of the means of production (Maslow's pyramid) and as a result - a dead end in the development of capitalism. Therefore, in this place there is a singularity between the crisis and non-crisis economies (see "Secrets ..."). This will be the breakdown... of the world into depression and the collapse of global markets into macro-regions”. How this singularity will be “jumped” is not known.

The authors are right that In this situation, Russia has a unique advantage: the former two-party political system, which has exhausted its resources, has not had time to take shape in our country…”. However, the authors do not take into account that it also belongs to those countries whose political system was based for a long time (70 years - three, four generations) on the economic platform of V. I. Lenin. This platform is not affected by the technological singularity - the goals are different (laws in the terms of I.V. Stalin). JV Stalin in his work “Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR” defined both the goals of capitalism and the goals of socialism, namely:
“The essential features and requirements of the basic economic law of socialism could be formulated approximately as follows: ensuring maximum satisfaction of the constantly growing material and cultural needs of the whole society through the continuous growth and improvement of socialist production on the basis of higher technology.” For a long time it was formulated in the form: "The good of the people is the highest goal of the party."
“The main features and requirements of the basic economic law of modern capitalism could be formulated approximately as follows: ensuring the maximum capitalist profit through the exploitation, ruin and impoverishment of the majority of the population of a given country, through the enslavement and systematic robbery of the peoples of other countries, especially backward countries, and finally, through wars and militarization of the national economy, used to ensure the highest profits. (Highlighted by the author). Regardless of the field of activity - only "profit" or - this is housing and communal services, or - this is the military-industrial complex.

However, Soviet and then Russian economists lacked a scientific understanding (abstract representation of the economy as an object of study) about the structures of these economic platforms, and the political systems on these platforms lacked an understanding of the place and role of the party in the economy. This led to what seemed to them the best when the economy will be managed by "economists and lawyers" - this is in the absence of a scientific understanding of the object of management, and the party will deal with ideology. As a result, against the background of such illiteracy of "economists and lawyers", the political system "moved" to the economic platform of A. Smith.

Now back to " ... present time ...", which was mentioned above. To those countries whose political systems are based on the economic platform of V. I. Lenin, world economists strongly suggest transferring to the platform of A. Smith. For example, V. M. Mazurin. "The Vietnamese Economy Today". M. Publishing House "Forum". 2013. In some, even in the charter it is written about the need to strive for a market economy. For example, from "Secrets ...". P It seems that in “Chinese specifics” there are two concepts that seem to contradict each other: from the Charter of the CPC.

“a) Firmly upholding the socialist path, the democratic dictatorship of the people, the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party and Marxism-Leninism, the ideas of Mao Zedong are the foundation of our state. In the whole process of socialist modernization it is necessary to adhere firmly to these four basic principles and to fight against bourgeois liberalization.

b) It is necessary to radically reform the economic system, which fetters the development of productive forces, to preserve and improve the socialist market economy system and, in accordance with this, to reform the political system and reform other areas.

Deploy the basic role of the market …» . This also indicates that the Chinese comrades also do not represent the place and role of the Party (CCP) in the economy, but are going blind - so far successfully. Without realizing that the basis of the market is competition, which is driving force crises and corruption.

So far, the political systems of these countries are firmly on the platform of V. I. Lenin, and then we'll see. In general, for the authors of such proposals, the market economy is something that is infallible. She is for them like a God for believers, whose existence is not discussed.

Now let's turn to the main task that the political system proposed by the authors should solve. «… move on to the formation of the political system of tomorrow, the main task of which should be maintaining stability against the background of crisis processes around the world ". The question becomes again - the stability of the political system, on what platform? Here we take it as an axiom: "If the economic platform does not develop stably, then the political system on it shakes, and if it is stable, then the political system is stable."

The economy on the platform of A. Smith, in principle, cannot develop stably:

a) the goal of economic development is not known - is it possible to name the goal of economic development of the USA, France, Germany, etc. - No. It means that it is not known how to manage - that is why this economy works in a weathervane mode,

b) It is not known who governs, but it is known that it is the elite that governs, but who it is - in a surname - is not known. Only its goal is known and all managers of the economy - to make a profit with an eye to the laws or not - it's how it will turn out, and such managers have a lot of continuum power at all levels - from the federation to the rural settlement. From here, the economy develops spontaneously, and all the time tends to a crisis. Its offensive is announced by the elite, not some economists and lawyers. Therefore, the development of the economy is one realization of a non-stationary random process, and all sorts of cycles, patterns are the appearance of a pattern and are rather the cause of sunspots. The onset of the crisis can only be guessed. Therefore, after the onset of the next crisis, several economists and others appear who claim that they are still in N - th year they warned that the crisis would be in such and such a year (the author belongs to the latter (etc.)).

The economy on the platform of V. And Lenin is developing more stably, since not only the budget is planned there (the skin is not killed ...), but also production. The goal is known - the good of the people, and who governs - the party (national elite). The structure of the economy is multi-loop, which means it works faster and more accurately - China out of the "crisis" of 2009 went beyond the quarters. The party controls the managers. It is inscribed in the structure of the economy (see "Secrets ...") - control signals reach without delay. It is possible to forecast for 3-5 years.

Since the authors have not decided on a platform, it makes no sense to further discuss the task (the goal of the political system). Having not decided on the task, talk about its content, structure, methodology for solving the problem, management, organization and personnel, all the more so.

2. Regarding global business, which “… provides not only the level of competition necessary to maintain society “in good shape”, but also modern technologies– both industrial and, what is becoming more important, social”, then it’s worth remembering the words of Lenya Golubkov, who told his brother in an advertisement for the famous MMM pyramid: “We are partners with you.” The brother replied: “You are a freeloader, Lenya.” There is nothing more to add. As for competition, we must imagine that it is more often unfair (just “competition” is defined in the law “On Protection of Competition”, but is not tied to certain numerical concepts). In the economy based on the platform of V. I. Lenin, competition is socialist competition ( see "The Immediate Tasks of the Soviet Power").

3 . The proposal for a single emission center on the territory of Russia, it is necessary to understand the place and role of such a Central Bank in the structure of the economy of this association (EAEU). THE CENTRAL BANK IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY (PLACE AND ROLE)http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/rus/catalog/pages/14122.html. The economy is one, after all, and therefore planning should be common, so that the emission would also be common, and not each one on its own.

Such an element should be included in the financial system, and not be above or outside it and try to manage the economy as a "black box".

Regarding the old parties and the New Democracy, it is necessary to imagine the place and role of parties on each economic platform and how many there can be. This is for the "Basics ...". Otherwise, one gets the impression that the authors are economists, but they do not represent the place and role of parties in the economy.

As for the name, something else is needed, otherwise they can call it a little differently - “der ...”, etc. Actually, about the word “Democracy”, you don’t need to translate it from Greek, but read 4-8. Further, we confine ourselves to a remark about understanding the processes taking place in China, so read "Secrets ...". Regarding the movement of the left in Europe and other parts, the whole problem there is the lack of theory, and everything goes spontaneously. It is unlikely that anything will happen spontaneously - the opposite side is organized.

This expression is not clear at all "" Democratic values are forcing the West to demand real electoral potential from the Russian opposition, at least at the level of 20%.

As for electoral opportunities, you won’t surprise anyone when criticizing privatization, because you can’t put criticism on a plate, and returning privatized back is a dream…. Therefore, alas, some kind of “bright future” is needed. It has always been so.

Thus, before the proposed political system is “planted” on the appropriate platform, it is not possible to determine whether this is something new or another political system of slogans. So far, this is a kind of idea and not even at the level of content. Therefore, we end with a reminder of Karl Marx:

« Ideas do nothing at all. The implementation of ideas requires people who must use practical force.

Andrey Yashnik

article read: 6938 people

Mikhail Delyagin:

Yes, a crisis is an opportunity. German Gref, who I hate, said a brilliant thing in 2008: “For the majority, it’s like crashing into a concrete wall at a speed of 70 km per hour, and with luck, you can spend two weeks in the hospital.” A crisis is a rather painful thing.

The most common question asked in all classrooms is: When will the crisis end? It won't end because it's not really a crisis. A crisis is a transition to some new quality. It means to seep through the eye of the needle, and something will open behind it. So, in our case, this is not a transition to a new quality. This is the very new quality. We just don't like the unknown, and we hide from it. Uncertainty is now a normal state, at least throughout our lives.

The main elements of the crisis are as follows. New technologies are already changing not only social relations, but also the person himself, behavioral and value systems. A generation of people has already grown up who make decisions absolutely freely, without any external influence.

In the global market, monopolies rot. Through the commercialization of technologies that were created during cold war, an attempt is made to increase the level of consumption through technological development. She failed in my opinion. Because new technologies are super-productive. Productivity is growing faster than the capacity of the markets they create, and we are seeing the emergence of “excess” people, and the middle class of developed countries, who consume too much and produce too little. As a result, the middle class in developed countries is disappearing and eroding. And this is a critical part of global demand. The economy of tomorrow is an economy without demand. Big hello to market relations.

The middle class is the symbol and basis of democracy. The political system of tomorrow is not democracy, at least in the traditional, Western sense of the word.

This does not mean that everything is hopeless. There are many bright spots. Not only in information technology, but even in agriculture. But these are nothing more than individual spots. 30 years will go down in history not as a time of missed opportunities, but as a time of national betrayal. ———-takeaway

Mikhail Khazin:

There is a wonderful phrase: "The salvation of the drowning is the work of the drowning themselves." You can't use existing features if you don't want to use them. If you look at the picture of our state in retrospect, then, with a few exceptions, it moved within the framework of one model. Some call it liberal market, others call it consensus. Never mind. The important thing is that this model of economic growth can no longer function. And nowhere. Nowhere in the world is capital reproduced today. If it is not reproduced, then the economy is not reproduced.

Why does no one want to think about switching to another model? The main problem: as soon as you have some kind of resource, an elite group appears that serves this resource.

In the "Washington" consensus model, investments were the main resource. And on this resource and privatization, the modern Russian elite has grown. These people categorically do not want to change the model, because in this case they will have to leave. And they are constantly telling us from all the screens that we need to make sure that foreign investments go. But how you can convince someone to invest in a situation that gives only losses, I do not know.

The current situation in Russia is as follows. The existing economic model, which is protected by the government and the Central Bank, is guaranteed to give a 2.5-3% decline from year to year. Now the head of the Central Bank, Elvira Nabiullina, is trying to accelerate this decline, as she supports an overvalued ruble in order to ensure that international speculators more efficiently withdraw capital from Russia through carry trade operations.

Theoretically, we can provide 5-7% economic growth in our country per year for at least 20 years. But we have no practical possibility, because this will require a revolution in the classical sense of the word. That is, the change of the ruling elite. The current one does not pull, does not understand, but it will cling to power at any cost.

Change can be either from below or from above. From below, on the 100th anniversary of the revolution, no one wants to do this. And from above... The President is well aware that if he starts doing something, then it is impossible to avoid the situation "a la 1937". He does not want this and is counting on some external factors that will force him to make a decision.

Is there a chance to stop being a country that depends mainly on the sale of hydrocarbons?

Mikhail Khazin:

What does the price of hydrocarbons have to do with it? The situation works differently. The elite believes that it determines both the rules of the game and, accordingly, how assets should be distributed.

Mikhail Delyagin:

We can agree on anything. If we agree with any elite on the time of dawn, even if there is a complete consensus, dawn will still come according to its schedule.

The problem of "peeling off" from the raw needle in economic terms does not exist. This is the problem of motivating the state, what it wants. The state is an amazing machine - it honestly solves the tasks that it has set for itself. Krivenko, on the "C grade", with costs, not in those terms, but decides. But if this machine is for destruction and plunder, then it will not solve the problems of development. Just because it's not her job. The car drives, it does not drill. A screwdriver can drive a nail, but a screw cannot be unscrewed with a hammer. This is a question of changing the motivation of society and the development model.

But there is a world problem. This is the creation of new technologies. This is not a market and anti-democratic occupation. Progress is machines instead of butter and laboratories instead of butter. Not a single person will refuse today's consumption for the sake of tomorrow's incomprehensible benefits.

What awaits us, what will be the positive prospects? The global market is collapsing. When this process is completed, it will be a breakdown into a global depression. Breaking the world into these pieces, on the one hand, will provoke a terrible situation: technologies were created in a monopoly logic. And monopolies make money by inflating costs. Therefore, today's technologies are excessively complex. Accordingly, excessively expensive. Therefore, for many of them there will be no sales markets, there will not be the proper number of consumers. This will also apply to life support technologies. It is no longer possible to create a new generation of antibiotics, which is vital.

There will be a situation threatening technological collapse. And here Russia suddenly has a competitive advantage. Our country was the only place in the world where there was such a thing as a military-industrial complex. Due to the monstrous inefficiency of management, this was the only place in the world where huge amounts of money were allocated for research, roughly speaking, just like that. No guaranteed result. As a result, a large number of strange technologies were created that were distinguished by primitiveness, respectively, low cost and high performance. It is now impossible to introduce them in a normal monopolized economy.

What does laser hardening of rails mean, which increases the price by 10% and reduces wear by 30%? This means that more than half of the rail industry should be thrown into the trash along with workers, trade unions, businessmen, politicians and taxes. This is impossible, therefore it was blocked both in the West and in our country.

But technology lived in the pores of society, it is an element of our culture. If we survive as a society that is capable of thinking about itself, we will have a good competitive advantage.

The bad news is that a new reality is being created that doesn't need humans. When superfluous people become global problem. Now there are two models - the utilization of the population for undeveloped countries (physical during the "Arab spring"), and for developed countries - through virtual reality. When you get a capsule apartment, a virtual reality through which people get better emotions than in real life, and food rations, which allows you to quietly exist for a while. And, probably, after a while people will learn to use it.

The problem is that knowledge does not live on a reservation. Secret knowledge always dies. History is replete with examples of this. Therefore, if the situation when people are thrust into virtual reality is realized, then humanity will crumble. It will be a new crisis, comparable to the Neolithic in its consequences.

There is a way out that the USSR failed to cope with: to force people to engage in self-improvement and turn it into an occupation for a person. How to do this is still unknown, and there is not even a statement of such a problem. Because it is not a task for business.

At the same time, as it is said in the famous film, “if you want to live, you won’t get so upset.” And this is our perspective, because of the relatively large societies, we are the only ones who combine the three elements of culture: we are inclined to technology, to humanism, and at the same time also messianic. It is not enough for us to see the truth, we must carry it to everyone else, otherwise we feel socially inferior. And this is our competitive advantage.

Can you formulate several necessary decisions for the government of the Russian Federation to take that will lead to significant economic growth, including at the regional level?

Mikhail Khazin:

It is very difficult to explain today what is the source of growth. There will be no foreign investment, and domestic investment, in rubles, is prohibited by the Central Bank. For this reason, the only source of development is local territory. And here there is a way to make the city itself become a source of jobs for itself. In Perm, there is no need to increase the population by more than three times. There are already a million people. For this reason it is possible.

If it is very conditional, then this is the creation of an urban environment in which a self-supporting system of people working on each other is formed. This requires some investment, but much less than some people think. The key point is the involvement of its own population in these processes.

Another thing is that in Russia there are no cities in the Western sense of the word. All major cities of Soviet times are a set of industrial settlements. And for this reason, nothing is connected, there is no city life. Such centers as the Perm Opera House, in a city of this magnitude, should not even be 10 or 20, but 300-400. They may not be known outside the region, but they must be popular inside. As soon as such a cultural urban environment appears, it immediately begins to support a similar situation in satellite cities. In the same Kudymkar. Nothing will work without this.

It seems to me that this is a key point that should be addressed today, regardless of economic growth. Offering this project to a city with half a million people will not work. The critical value is 800 thousand people. You will succeed. But if you do nothing, then water does not flow under a lying stone.

popular internet

The policy pursued by "our" economic bloc is so obvious harm to the economy and the population that its definition as criminal has become a commonplace. Economists openly talk about it and political scientists argue about it. However, with the diagnosis of the causes of what is happening, there were clear disagreements.

Most sane economists agree that this is a consequence of the elementary illiteracy and unsuitability of the representatives of the so-called liberal clan, brought to power by the "West". Judging by Ms. Nabiullina, who could not defend her dissertation in any way, this opinion has some basis.

Supporters of Khazin and Delyagin argue that the reason is that they are directly dependent on the global liberal elites and do not serve the interests of the country, but serve global business and its ideologists.

Adherents of the Fedorov sect argued that what was happening was the result of the occupation legislation and it was enough for the pedRosovtsy to get 2/3 in parliament, how they would change the Constitution, legislation, and we would "sovereignly" live like "in Christ's bosom." The result of their activities, after the "victory", is well known ... It became clear to adequate members of the sect that they were "divorced" and the goal of the NOD was to push more accomplices of the compradors into parliament, under pseudo-patriotic slogans.

What unites all these concepts diligently thrown into the media space: reference to some external force. Instead of analyzing the economic interests of social groups and classes modern Russia, they shift the focus of public attention to its foreign enemies. I am convinced that this is the result of the purposeful activity of the interested parties, which we need to identify.

If this is true, then behind the outwardly chaotic and / or "illiterate" actions of our economic authorities, it will be revealed iron logic and someone's selfish interest.

Therefore, let's try following the old principle: Cui prodest? (Who benefits), identify the true customers, the policy pursued! We will try to analyze the most egregious actions / decisions of the government and the Central Bank and correlate their consequences with the interests of a certain social group: "comprador bourgeoisie" or simply COMPRADORS.

Who are compradors?

First, let's look at a few facts:

What conclusions about the ongoing processes can we draw? A significant part of the "Russian" bourgeoisie, and, as we see, not only the so-called oligarchs (not all of the 20,000 who left belong to them), organized their economic activity in a special way. Despite the "domestic", by the nature of the source of wealth, affiliation, they purposefully withdraw to the West the income received through the exploitation of national wealth and the population of Russia. This process is growing. As can be seen from the above data, instead of developing their business in Russia, they withdraw an increasing part of their profits from the country, draining its economy.

Therefore, instead of the development of industry, there is a continuous degradation of production (primarily complex, science-intensive, with a high share of surplus value). The result is a simplification of the structure of production, the transformation of the country into a raw material appendage of the global West. Thus, a vicious economic model has been formed in the country, in which increased exploitation within Russia does not lead to the accumulation of national wealth and strengthening the economy of the state (albeit in the hands of a narrow circle of the national bourgeoisie). Instead, its outflow to the global West only intensifies... Particular cases of the consequences of this process are general impoverishment and the growth of social inequality within the country.

It is this part of the bourgeoisie, which mainly sells mineral wealth and / or low-grade products abroad, as raw materials (for further processing in the West) that are called compradors. Thus, the compradors act as junior partners in relation to the countries of the capitalist core, which plays the role of the metropolis of Russia.

Due to economic ties and their own views, these people are much more connected with the global West than with Russia. Firstly, the consumers of their products are located outside of Russia. So economic situation they are not interested in citizens and domestic producers - it is more important for them to have solvent demand in the West. Secondly: they are connected with the West by assets and the future: their children, villas, financial resources, etc. - everything is there in the true "homeland". Therefore, our country is only a source of profit for them - no more...

Adherents of the Fedorov sect argued that what was happening was the result of the occupational legislation and it was enough for the pedRosovites to get 2/3 in parliament, how they would change the Constitution, legislation, and we would “sovereignly” live like “in Christ’s bosom.” The result of their activities, after the "victory", is well known ... It became clear to the adequate members of the sect that they were "divorced" and the goal of the NOD was to smuggle more accomplices of the compradors into parliament, under pseudo-patriotic slogans.

What unites all these concepts diligently thrown into the media space: reference to some external force. Instead of analyzing the economic interests of social groups and classes in modern Russia, they shift the focus of public attention to its foreign enemies. I am convinced that this is the result of the purposeful activity of the interested parties, which we need to identify.

If this is true, then behind the outwardly chaotic and / or "illiterate" actions of our economic authorities, it will be revealed iron logic and someone's selfish interest.

Therefore, let's try following the old principle: Cui prodest? (Who benefits), identify the true customers, the policy pursued! We will try to analyze the most egregious actions/decisions of the government and the Central Bank and correlate their consequences with the interests of a certain social group: the “comprador bourgeoisie” or simply COMPRADORS.

Who are compradors?

First, let's look at a few facts:

1. “In Russia, approximately 0.2% of families (!!!) control about 70% of the national wealth,” Valery Goreglyad, former deputy head of the Accounts Chamber, now Chief Auditor of the Central Bank of Russia, said back in 2011.

2. The total capital of 28 Russian dollar billionaires increased by $17.09 billion in January-August 2017 (Bloomberg Billionaires Index data);

3. Over the past 13 years, 20 thousand dollar millionaires and billionaires have left Russia, and 6 thousand of them - only in the last three years;

4. Up to 40% of the oligarchs have already renounced Russian citizenship;

5. Russia's national wealth has not grown since the 1990s, but has been redistributed, and then flowed offshore. Now there is an amount equal to 75% of Russia's national income (more than 1.3 trillion dollars). Please note that these amounts do not include legal assets withdrawn directly to Western countries.

6. The net outflow of capital from the Russian Federation in the first half of 2017 increased to $14.7 billion, 1.7 times compared to the data for the same period last year.

What conclusions about the ongoing processes can we draw? A significant part of the “Russian” bourgeoisie, and, as we can see, not only the so-called oligarchs (not all of the 20,000 who left belong to them), organized their economic activity in a special way. Despite their “domestic” affiliation, by the nature of the source of wealth, they purposefully transfer to the West the income received through the exploitation of the national wealth and the population of Russia. This process is growing. As can be seen from the above data, instead of developing their business in Russia, they withdraw an increasing part of their profits from the country, draining its economy.

Therefore, instead of the development of industry, there is a continuous degradation of production (primarily complex, science-intensive, with a high share of surplus value). The result is a simplification of the structure of production, the transformation of the country into a raw material appendage of the global West. Thus, a vicious economic model has been formed in the country, in which increased exploitation within Russia does not lead to the accumulation of national wealth(albeit in the hands of a narrow circle of the national bourgeoisie) and strengthening the economy of the state. Instead, its outflow to the global West (the countries of the core of the capitalist system) only intensifies ... Particular cases of the consequences of this process are general impoverishment and the growth of social inequality within the country.

It is THIS part of the bourgeoisie, primarily selling abroad mineral wealth and/or low value-added products as raw materials (for further processing in the West) are called compradors. Thus, the compradors act as junior partners in relation to the countries of the capitalist core, which plays the role of the metropolis of Russia.

Due to economic ties and their own views, these people are much more connected with the global West than with Russia. Firstly, the consumers of their products are located outside of Russia. Therefore, they are not interested in the economic situation of citizens and domestic producers - it is more important for them to have solvent demand in the West. Secondly: they are connected with the West by assets and the future: their children, villas, financial resources, etc. - everything is there in the true "homeland". Therefore, our country is only a source of profit for them - no more…

Banksters adjoin them - five banks that monopolize the financial market, owners of federal networks (as a rule, non-residents of the Russian Federation), who "saddle" trade and raise the markup up to 300%, and other bourgeois oriented towards the global West

From the above data, we can see that these people have enormous combined economic power, often exceeding even the capabilities of the state (more than a trillion dollars, only in offshore accounts). It would be surprising if they did not use it to exert political influence on the processes taking place inside Russia, in the interests of your social group. Consequently, they should be joined by major officials and politicians serving their interests within the state.

Is this true and in whose interests is the financial and economic policy of the state carried out? The most egregious and discussed facts:

*Extremist and terrorist organizations banned in Russian Federation: Jehovah's Witnesses, National Bolshevik Party, Right Sector, Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), Islamic State (IS, ISIS, Daesh), Jabhat Fatah ash-Sham, Jabhat al-Nusra ”, “Al-Qaeda”, “UNA-UNSO”, “Taliban”, “Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people”, “Misanthropic Division”, “Brotherhood” Korchinsky, “Trident them. Stepan Bandera", "Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists" (OUN)

Now on main

politics and religion

A_NALGIN

About not being able to keep silent in time

There are not so few situations when it is better to chew - but at least snot! - than to speak. And in theory, a sense of proportion, taste and tact should help to avoid them. Especially politics. But... where did you see all this among the current representatives of the ruling Russian elite? The well-known statesman could not resist and spoke out on a sore point. And, perhaps, even said quite reasonable ...

16.01.2019 15:46 43

Society

A_NALGIN

About the trap for those traveling abroad

According to statistics, more than half of the adult population of Russia has never left its borders and did not travel at least temporarily to neighboring countries. And outside former USSR at least 80% of Russians have never been in their lives. Perhaps now they will not visit. And not for economic reasons. Russian authorities, it seems, they will not part with the idea of limiting the exit one way or another ...

15.01.2019 17:37 36

Society

A_NALGIN

About breakthroughs and gaps of the past year

On Old New Year used to remember the past. And this year, when vague anxiety covers people on both sides of the ocean, even more so. By the way, there is a premonition that relatively soon we will have to see how right those who claimed that we would still commemorate 2018 with a kind word as a very good time were right. How will he be remembered by the world?

14.01.2019 15:41 30

Economy

A_NALGIN

About gifts to Russians for the Old New Year

While half of Russia is resting on an extended vacation, surprises are pouring into the Russians like from a bucket. So believe after that in the dead season in January! State banks are raising mortgage rates, the State Duma is tightening the screws, but the most important thing… …is happening in the consumer market. Rosstat published data on price growth for the first decade of 2019. The average temperature in the hospital is an increase in pre-New Year prices of 0.5%, ...

13.01.2019 13:06 39

Society

A_NALGIN

About those who will never be replaced by robots

Photo © Reuters. Robotization, this storm of the XXI century for employees, successfully and quickly penetrates into all areas. The title photo shows robot trainers for pets that can operate both autonomously and in smartphone control mode. That is, even the most exotic occupations of people quite successfully obey the general trend to replace a person with a machine. And who especially...

11.01.2019 5:53 39

Economy

A_NALGIN

About the best future of Russia

Let's talk about the future without apocalyptic predictions and pessimistic forecasts. Let's say that everything will not be so bad around Russia. War will not start, revolution will not happen, #oil will not collapse, punitive #sanctions will not be introduced, and even another global #crisis will not begin. How will Russia prosper then? According to realistic forecasts of the World Bank, the Russian #economy will be able to continue its progressive growth. Thus, Russia's #GDP will increase by 5% in the next three years. This is one of…

10.01.2019 13:32 38

Economy

A_NALGIN

On the mystery of America's debts, incomprehensible to Russians

In polite society, the phrase “Have you seen the US national debt?” already considered indecent - and thank God! But just a little step aside, and the brain of the average Russian boils, straying into the usual patterns about debt bondage and poor America. As well as other similar heresy. You don't have to look far for examples. Most recently, a report that 24 million Americans believe that taking money in…

9.01.2019 14:57 30

Science and technology

A_NALGIN

On the enchanting superiority of Ukraine over Russia

Frankly, this could not have happened. Or something similar. All the long-term and wise efforts of Russian statesmen led to this, starting in 2013, and maybe even earlier. In fairness, it must be admitted that, for their part, the Ukrainians also tried a lot - in good sense. And for the national pride of the Great Russians, it should be insulting, probably ...

8.01.2019 15:57 48

Politics

A_NALGIN

About the future of Russia in one photo

Photo © Reuters. Divination on Christmas Eve is a holy and holy tradition in Russia. Not only girls do this. Everyone wants to look into the future. Moreover, here, in the photo, everything is so obvious that you don’t even need to guess. Of course, only a small fragment was chosen as the title picture. And the whole picture is under the cut. This is the meeting...

7.01.2019 18:21 36

Economy

A_NALGIN

On the impending catastrophe for "our everything"

As is often the case in real life, the fur-bearing animal crept up unnoticed. While "understanding people" in every way ridiculed the ambitious plans of their neighbors on the continent, they simply worked on them. Not without the help of the state treasury, of course. But now those investments seem to be starting to pay off. And although the catastrophe in the title will obviously not happen tomorrow or even in the coming year, it ...

5.01.2019 17:56 32

Science and technology

A_NALGIN

About the valiant army of China, which will soon conquer the entire planet

Photo © Reuters Ancient #China is known for many incredible achievements, one of which is undoubtedly Terracotta Army Emperor Qin Shi Huang, equally renowned for his untold riches and unbridled cruelty. Now associations with that era are caused by a new army being created in the vicinity of Suzhou, in the province of Jiangsu. Her warriors are in the title photo. Yes, these are commercially produced iPal household robots. They are made by a Chinese company...

4.01.2019 16:28 44

Society

A_NALGIN

About the main cause of all women's misfortunes

V public transport any country in the world can see a similar picture. Young people - regardless of gender - are cheerful, active, mobile and happy. But that's not the case with middle age. The men look relaxed, self-satisfied and almost happy. Whereas women are the complete opposite. A tense look, drooping shoulders, dull eyes and pursed lips ... No, happy ...